ECOLOGY WITHOUT NATURE: Michael Marder in the New York Times

Monday, March 21, 2016

Michael Marder in the New York Times

...on plants and Chernobyl. Well worth reading.

1 comment:

HenryVorn said...: Could you write a collection of single sentence aphorisms on OOO? I want that book like no other.; March 23, 2016 at 8:02 AM

“Outstanding.”
—Slavoj Zizek, In Defense of Lost Causes

“Dark ecology has the potential to be the punk rock or experimental pop of ecological thinking.”
—Kasino A4

“It isn’t [nature] itself that needs trashing — we’re doing a fine job of that already; it’s our way of thinking about it that needs to be structurally realigned ... it's an important book that, in a scant 205 pages of main text ... frames a debate that no doubt will be carried on for years to come.”
—Vince Carducci, Pop Matters

“He practices what he theorizes: nothing is wasted in his argumentation.”
—Emmanouil Aretoulakis, Synthesis

“Picking up where his most obvious predecessors, Gregory Bateson and Felix Guattari, left off, Morton understands mental ecology as the ground zero of ecological thinking, as that which must be redressed before anything else and above all. Morton goes beyond both his forebears, however, in repairing the rift between science and the humanities, which the Enlightenment opened up and against which Romanticism reacted. Perhaps most pleasantly surprising, given its erudition, is that in its stylistic elegance The Ecological Thought is as satisfying to read as it is necessary to ponder.”
—Vince Carducci

ECOLOGY WITHOUT NATURE

Pages

Monday, March 21, 2016

Michael Marder in the New York Times

1 comment:

Counter

ShareThis

Links without Nature

Artifacts without Nature