Nature is not natural and can never be naturalized — Graham Harman

Saturday, May 12, 2012

More Intuitions on Hegel

“that clumsy and nauseating charlatan, that pernicious person, who completely disorganized and ruined the minds of a whole generation”

“a commonplace, inane, loathsome, repulsive and ignorant charlatan, who with unparalleled effrontery compiled a system of crazy nonsense that was trumpeted abroad as immortal wisdom by his mercenary followers”


If that's too intense for you, try this very simple and devastating one by Steven Shaviro: has long seemed to me that any modern philosophy needs to begin with a counter-defense of Kant against Hegel. In the terms of SR, evidently, Kant is a weak correlationist while Hegel is a strong correlationist. Hegel’s argument against Kant is very much a form of correlationist argument — it is basically Stove’s Gem — to affirm something is to posit it and thence to know it. Hegel is simply saying that, by thinking that there are things outside of our thought, we are thereby bringing them into our thought. This is precisely the argument that SR most strongly rejects. 

No comments: