You know the more I get into the details of finishing Buddhaphobia the more respect I have for Schopenhauer. I'd written him off for what I saw as his misunderstandings about Buddhism. But it's a very coherent view he has there and it's not completely dissimilar. Also, to swim against the racist, Christian white European (I'm not kidding—one word: Gobineau) orthodoxy of his day, to the point of having a Buddha statue in your front lobby to greet people who visited your office—that takes guts.
2 comments:
This happens more in some fields than others, doesn't it. We don't despise Newtown because it turns out his theories were wrong; we recognise them as an important step forward, albeit superseded by relativity, etc. Yet Schopenhauer's readings of Buddhism and the Upanishads are no less necessary a step towards cultural understanding. I'm reminded of a recent article in the LRB about Goethe and Edward Said: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v32/n24/marina-warner/in-the-time-of-not-yet
What is your take on Nietzsche's attack on Schopenhauer and Buddhism? Was it Buddhaphobia?
Post a Comment