So here is Rob on Graham's book. It's a great example of how to do a post, I reckon. You learn something. Take away line, for me:
By ... following where the rabbit hole goes (so to speak) into renewing the in-itself, both arrive at spectacularly different conclusions. Meillassoux arrives at a Virtual God and an immanence of effects without causes, Harman arrives at an object that cannot be exhausted and speculates that causes have no effects, (or as its known, the logical premise of a dormant object).
Nicely done mate.
No comments:
Post a Comment