Pages
▼
Saturday, June 18, 2011
Derrida on Agamben
...ouch. I'm getting around finally to reading The Beast and the Sovereign, in which Derrida pulls no punches in quite the devastating assault on Agamben. I'm afraid I do take sides here, since I find Agamben infuriatingly arrogant in just the way Derrida does: “he must feel that he is surrounded by a lot of idiots, who are more bĂȘtes and more blind than is possible.” Critical animal studies folks will notice the charged language here.
Poor Levinas, writes Agamben (writes Derrida), didn't know what he was talking about in 1934, but I, Agamben, will fill him in. Silly Foucault, he wasn't able to push his biopolitics as far as I, Agamben, have done: “Foucault was almost the first ...” And so on: “Agamben ... wants to be twice first, the first to see and the first to announce an unprecedented and new thing ...”
Exactly. Luckily Agamben is waning in my neck of the humanities.
I just reread this the other day for a paper I am writing. I was again bowled over by Derrida's strong attack on him. Quite scathing. Is Agamben really disappearing?
ReplyDelete