tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post6310898960186916752..comments2024-03-28T09:51:55.365-06:00Comments on ECOLOGY WITHOUT NATURE: Graham on Continental vs. AnalyticalTimothy Mortonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05067377804366363020noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post-898056208019326892012-10-19T00:56:09.101-05:002012-10-19T00:56:09.101-05:00It wasn't Hume, it was Berkeley.It wasn't Hume, it was Berkeley.K.C.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16615328866645036838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post-81161662177270323642010-11-29T16:40:20.407-06:002010-11-29T16:40:20.407-06:00This old post makes some interesting comments abou...<a href="http://el-prod.baylor.edu/certain_doubts/?p=322" rel="nofollow">This old post</a> makes some interesting comments about the "late 20th century nonsense police" tendency in philosophy, which seems to consist of a lot of declarations that certain areas of philosophy are "nonsense", but not a lot of explanation of why the accuser thinks so. It doesn't even require being Continental to fall afoul of said nonsense-police; the writer and commenters there are all analytic philosophers, but apparently from the wrong parts.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15939949185232291652noreply@blogger.com