tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post8197106830764503147..comments2024-03-25T08:59:38.714-06:00Comments on ECOLOGY WITHOUT NATURE: Look what You Can Do with Marx if You Deploy OOOTimothy Mortonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05067377804366363020noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post-24808807168800208792017-08-27T22:03:11.056-05:002017-08-27T22:03:11.056-05:00and the weird might -have -been alongside the was ...and the weird might -have -been alongside the was which isn't. ...<br /><br />I'm catching up on your blog, so worried about you in this hurricane :( D. E.M.https://www.blogger.com/profile/05547424481936255550noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post-40575967456656496512017-08-05T22:14:00.888-05:002017-08-05T22:14:00.888-05:00Wild outpouring of creativity after a bit of a dro...Wild outpouring of creativity after a bit of a drought here. Wonderful exposition and re imagining of what I take to be some constructs of quantum time. Poetry disguised as a blog post. Mellifluous. Read it twice. Really anticipating the inter species solidarity book after the other posts. <br /><br />The last sentence: "But this poem is this poem, not that poem." To me this presupposes absolutes exist and my question is whether such absolutes exist absolutely? Since one references the Greeks and pulls the pants down on their formalism it would seem the other two laws ID/NC must be true: if this and not that -- except as you point out bestowing a materialist reference upon time allows us to do away with bothersome consistency, such as EM. I would ask is a really = a is the same as a = holographicly reconstructed a? And is that proposition then an absolute? John T. Maherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10579304947759570141noreply@blogger.com