tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post657711248983756358..comments2024-03-28T09:51:55.365-06:00Comments on ECOLOGY WITHOUT NATURE: OOOIII: Ian Bogost, "Seeing Things"Timothy Mortonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05067377804366363020noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post-5726556401022229202014-04-06T23:36:10.616-05:002014-04-06T23:36:10.616-05:00I dont think you arw wrong, StephenI dont think you arw wrong, Stephensangeetahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09687719867174155691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post-5243442470766996762014-04-06T23:34:34.373-05:002014-04-06T23:34:34.373-05:00I dont think you are wrong, Stephen. I dont think you are wrong, Stephen. sangeetahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09687719867174155691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post-71240573391370116572014-04-06T23:33:29.438-05:002014-04-06T23:33:29.438-05:00To Stephen: I dont think you are wrongTo Stephen: I dont think you are wrongsangeetahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09687719867174155691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post-3725195078278655082013-03-14T12:38:22.956-06:002013-03-14T12:38:22.956-06:00Not sure if anyone is still following this post, b...Not sure if anyone is still following this post, but...<br /><br />I am no philosopher, so advance apologies in that regard all around. Actually,it is precisely such expertise that I need to better understand the "what for" of the ideas championed in this wonderful video essay. Here are my questions.<br /><br />Is OOO as strongly related to certain strains of phenomenology as it seems? <br /><br />Is the apparent equivocation between an anti-narrative on the one hand, and an implicit confirmation of narrative as inescapable on the other, intentional or problematic? Or is it more like an extra-narrative -- narrative not so much denied but merely demoted (if so this seems not so new to me)? And if OOO tends more toward the extremes there, does it confront/embrace/locate the various -isms it thereby undergirds (relativism and primitivism are the two most troubling that come to mind), or ignore them as "not my problem" problems? That is, I intuit that this philosophy is deeply (and perhaps inadvertently) conservative-- how do I have that wrong?Stephenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07588626189596914008noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post-3791428179216537972012-08-09T09:22:53.453-05:002012-08-09T09:22:53.453-05:00fantastic. thanksfantastic. thanksAwaking Lucidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04895103534811454236noreply@blogger.com