tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post4981175843065811047..comments2024-03-28T09:51:55.365-06:00Comments on ECOLOGY WITHOUT NATURE: Vsauce Says HyperobjectTimothy Mortonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05067377804366363020noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post-23346861691002142802021-06-07T06:14:57.188-05:002021-06-07T06:14:57.188-05:00In natural language, an instance of the paradox of...In natural language, an instance of the paradox of entailment arises:<br /><br />It is raining<br />And<br /><br />It is not raining<br />Therefore<br /><br />George Washington is made of rakes.<br /><br /><br /><br />Hi<br /><br />I'm readling Being and event at the moment, (which uses ZFC as an ontology) which it seems is incapble of dealing with Classes - so I dont see it functioning a a metaontology! But have come across the ideas of inconsistent mathematics. The upshot being contadictions are allowed! Plus the rejection of naive set theory allows any satement to be logically true. Which strikes me as something OOO might be aware of. <br /><br /><br />https://iep.utm.edu/math-inc/#SH1a<br /><br /><br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradoxes_of_material_implication<br /><br /><br />best<br /><br />Jamesjliathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16441363626051314139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1438289051411770399.post-29252844213583622712021-06-07T06:14:11.187-05:002021-06-07T06:14:11.187-05:00in natural language, an instance of the paradox of...in natural language, an instance of the paradox of entailment arises:<br /><br />It is raining<br />And<br /><br />It is not raining<br />Therefore<br /><br />George Washington is made of rakes.<br /><br /><br /><br />Hi<br /><br />I'm readling Being and event at the moment, (which uses ZFC as an ontology) which it seems is incapble of dealing with Classes - so I dont see it functioning a a metaontology! But have come across the ideas of inconsistent mathematics. The upshot being contadictions are allowed! Plus the rejection of naive set theory allows any satement to be logically true. Which strikes me as something OOO might be aware of. <br /><br /><br />https://iep.utm.edu/math-inc/#SH1a<br /><br /><br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradoxes_of_material_implication<br /><br /><br />best<br /><br />Jamesjliathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16441363626051314139noreply@blogger.com